Transparency
We show our reasoning. Every verdict comes with span-level evidence you can inspect, not a mystery number.
TrueText AI was founded in 2023 by a small group of NLP researchers and former educators who watched AI-generated text go from a curiosity to a daily problem in classrooms and newsrooms. The detection tools they tried were either black boxes or wildly overconfident — flagging honest writers and missing obvious machine output.
So they built the tool they wished existed: one that reports a real probability, shows its reasoning sentence by sentence, and is honest about its limits. What began as a research prototype now scans more than 180 million documents a year for schools, publishers, and content teams.
We're a remote-first team of fifteen across four time zones, united by one belief — trust in the written word is worth protecting, and the only way to protect it is in the open.
We exist to help people tell human writing from machine writing — fairly, transparently, and without punishing honest authors. These values keep us honest while we do it.
We show our reasoning. Every verdict comes with span-level evidence you can inspect, not a mystery number.
We tune relentlessly against false positives, because a wrongly flagged writer is a real person who deserves better.
Your text is never used to train our models, and scanned content is purged on a rolling schedule.
We publish our benchmarks and limitations. Detection is hard, and pretending otherwise helps no one.
Fast, reliable, and easy enough that a teacher or editor can use it between two cups of coffee.
We design for judgement, not automation. TrueText informs your decision; it never makes it for you.
Researchers, engineers, and educators who care as much about fairness as they do about accuracy.
Former NLP researcher. Leads product and the detection roadmap.
Built the model pipeline that scores text in under three seconds.
Runs our benchmarking and false-positive reduction program.
Ex-teacher who keeps the product grounded in classroom reality.
Our 99.1% accuracy and 0.4% false-positive rate are measured on a balanced, independently held benchmark of human and AI-written samples. Real-world text is messier: heavily edited AI output, non-native writing, and very short passages are genuinely hard to classify.
That's why TrueText reports a probability rather than a verdict, highlights its evidence sentence by sentence, and is built to inform a human decision — never to replace one. We recommend using our score as one signal among several, especially when the stakes are high. We publish our methodology and update it as models evolve.
Try it on writing you already know the answer to. We think you'll trust the result — and we'll show you why.